Lost Password?
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color
Member Login

The Hong Kong College of Psychiatrists

Thursday
Sep 09th
Home arrow 會員及院士 arrow Sponsorship Scoring System
Sponsorship Scoring System PDF Print E-mail

Scoring System

Scoring scheme for selecting applicant to receive sponsorship*(w.e.f. 1 June 2003)

 


1. Never been sponsored in past 36 months 40
  Never been sponsored in past 24 months 30
  Never been sponsored in past 12 months 20
  Been sponsored in past 12 months 0
     
2. Fellow 10
  Member/Inceptor 5
     
3. Contribution to College  
  Office-bearers 15
  or Chairman of Subcommittee / Council Member 10
  or Subcommittee Member of the College 5
     
4. Presenting a paper (or poster presentation) 20**
     
5. Specification by sponsor 10***

 

*
1. Only fellows, Members and Inceptors can receive sponsorship through this scheme.

2. In case of tie, the Council may accord points.

3. The Council may require any successful candidate to submit a full written report on the sponsored function upon return.

4. If a successful candidate decides to withdraw from the function, he or she will be considered as having been sponsored on attending the function in the score calculation of future application for College sponsorship. 

**
5. The Council reserves the right to accord points on this item in relation to the scale and complexity of the presentation. In general, 20 points will be awarded to a paper presentation and 10 points will be awarded to a poster presentation.
 

***
6. If there is any criteria stipulated by the sponsor, it should be restricted to the general category of the applicant's nature of practice (public/private) and subspecialty or field of knowledge. The stipulation aims at choosing the candidate likely to benefit most from the function regarding its specific theme and focus. The restrictive criteria held by the sponsor should not deviate from the principle of delinking direct interest conferment from the sponsor to the recipient.

 

 
 
Next >